182. We limit our perception of the universe and reduce it
to simplest form. It is as if we sat listening to an orchestra playing a
symphony and heard only the violins. Someone sitting next to us may hear only
the drums. A third person hears only the horns. Each hears a true and honest
portion of the symphony. But only a few people hear the complete composition.
183. While pulling the words we hear from other people apart
to catch each individual strain of the music, we care not lose sight, or sound,
of the entire symphony. (92, 131-133)
184. While each hears an honest portion of the symphony (182)
none would be able to agree that the others were equally as valid in their
interpretations. This creates political parties.
185. The obvious seldom is.
186. That the principles of coincidence are always in
operation is not a reason to assume that every event is a significant
coincidence. Significance is the key.
187. Science has indicated that a gaseous substance will
expand to fill a vacuum. The same is true of networks and coincidence and
relationships. To reduce it to practical terms, the trivial will expand to fill
an empty relationship. Suddenly the speck of dust, the time of dinner, the
pattern of the china, all loom up as being incredibly significant.
188. Another viable legal alternative to obedience (17) is
malicious obedience. Unlike obedience, malicious obedience obeys the letter of
the law and ignores its spirit. This is the foundation of the legal profession
as it is not concerned with proving a person did or did not break the law, but
is focused on finding a law that makes the behavior legal.
189. Malicious obedience is the most common form of civil
disobedience in the modern world. It results in longer more defined and
therefore narrower laws and in page upon volumes of written interpretations.
This is as true in religion as it is in governance.
190. Malicious obedience is at least as old as the Bible (or
rather its legendary sources).
No comments:
Post a Comment